This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/38401] TreeSSA-PRE load after store misoptimization



------- Comment #6 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-04 17:35 -------
Subject: Re:  TreeSSA-PRE load after store misoptimization

Yes, i'm aware, but again, that is because my recollection is doing
partial antic partial avail with lifetime optimality requires code
placement that we don't do.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:27 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-04 17:27 -------
> by_all was there because you made it so on purpose. From tree-ssa-pre.c:
>
> "   For the partial anticipation case, we only perform insertion if it
>   is partially anticipated in some block, and fully available in all
>   of the predecessors.
> "
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38401
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38401


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]