This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/37811] bind1st fails on mem_fun with reference argument
- From: "igodard at pacbell dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Oct 2008 16:06:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/37811] bind1st fails on mem_fun with reference argument
- References: <bug-37811-6594@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2008-10-13 16:06 -------
Ah - I was looking at language DR109, not library DR109. However, the correct
DR says the committee approved the example reported here (and adds the fix) so
gcc appears to be in error to fail it. However, there is the curious remark:
"Howard believes there is a flaw in this resolution. See c++std-lib-9127.
We may need to reopen this issue."
Unfortunately Google turns up nothing for "c++std-lib-9127" except this cryptic
message, and just "9127" and other variations aren't productive either. Can you
tell me where to find it?
--
igodard at pacbell dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |igodard at pacbell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37811