This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/37146] [4.4 Regression] Invalid types with COND_EXPR
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Sep 2008 16:25:03 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/37146] [4.4 Regression] Invalid types with COND_EXPR
- References: <bug-37146-12710@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 16:25 -------
These constraints are supposed to be valid when in gimple, not generic. Maybe
the documentation in tree.def should reflect that (there is no generic type
system, if there was, it would be the much stricter that fold expects/produces)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37146