This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/33141] Intrinsic procedures: Improve warning/error with -std=*



------- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-21 12:17 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> For the "INTRINSIC :: " error, one could consider mentioning "-fall-intrinsics"
> in the error message.

I'll do so (as I already do in the warning message), this makes of course
sense.

> Regarding intrinsic subroutine and external/user-supplied function (and vice
> versa): I think it is OK to not to warn.

Ok, that's also what I'd do (and have implemented for now).

> >  -Wsurprising will warn when an intrinsic is treated as EXTERNAL because
> > of the standard settings.
> 
> You mean something like:
>   call gamma()
>        1
> Warning: 'gamma' at (1) is regarded as external procedure but also exists as
> intrinsic in Fortran 2008. You can [also?] use -fall-intrinsics to regard it as
> intrinsic

Exactly.  And if we should not enable this with -Wsurprising, I can add a new
flag (what's about -Wfuture-intrinsic?  But maybe -Wstd-intrinsic is better) to
control this warning (enabled at -Wall of course as I think this is a rather
"serious" warning).

Regarding -Wnonstd-intrinsic, what should I do there?  It is ignored now, and
I'll change this in the documentation (as well as mentioning the new flags, of
course); but do I also have to add some "deprecated" flag (if there is
something like that), or does the note in the documentation suffice?

Finally:  If an intrinsic called is included in a standard mentioned in
gfc_option.warn_std, I'm issuing a warning but calling this intrinsic instead
of treating it EXTERNAL; however, check_intrinsic_standard in intrinsic.c did
not issue such a warning for GNU extension intrinsics, and I had to take over
this behaviour as otherwise I'm getting tons of errors about "abort" in the
testsuite  (because of -pedantic); that's quite ok so, but please confirm this
is the way to go.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33141


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]