[Bug target/36713] [4.4 regression] r137252 breaks -O2 optimization on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

["rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de  2008-07-03 11:49 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.4 regression] r137252 breaks -O2 optimization
 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> ------- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-03 11:42 -------
> Differences in *.optimized dumps seem to be variable renaming only, e.g.
>  -  temp.1140 = tdata->p;
>  +  temp.1137 = tdata->p;
>
> Differences in *.alias seems to be mostly of the kind:
>  -PARM_NOALIAS.895 = &ANYTHING
>  +PARM_NOALIAS.895 = &ESCAPED
>
> However, I also found:
>  -PARM_NOALIAS.895 = { ANYTHING ESCAPED NONLOCAL }
>  -D.3410_6 = same as thread_data
>  -thread_data = { ANYTHING }
>  -D.3411_7 = same as thread_data
>  +PARM_NOALIAS.895 = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL }
>  +D.3410_6 = same as derefaddrtmp.893
>  +thread_data = same as derefaddrtmp.893         <---- ?!?
>  +D.3411_7 = same as derefaddrtmp.893

Well, it's not really different - only thread_data now doesn't
point to anything but to the same as derefaddrtmp.893 (I guess
that points to { ESCAPED NONLOCAL }?).

> which might hint at the problem: the variable thread_data is an allocated
> POINTER to a vector of structures (which hold more pointers), public within a
> module. USE-ing it, makes it (sort of) local to the function. Most (>80% of
> all) changes in *.optimized where in the one source file that uses this module
> ...
>
> Richard, would this fit the bill?

Well, if there is no difference in the optimized dumps then this
doesn't explain it (but the points-to differences also look good).

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36713