This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/36207] [4.4 regression] Ada bootstrap fails in uintp.adb:1595
- From: "aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 May 2008 13:50:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/36207] [4.4 regression] Ada bootstrap fails in uintp.adb:1595
- References: <bug-36207-8837@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-05-13 13:50 -------
Here is the information. I included the stage1 compiler as well just for
comparison purposes. For some reason, the source line information is missing
from both, but I suspect thats not very important.
Unfortunately, I don't see anything wrong here, so I'm not quite sure how to
proceed.
stage1
00000014 <_get_target_char_size>:
14: 55 push %ebp
15: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
17: b8 08 00 00 00 mov $0x8,%eax
1c: 5d pop %ebp
1d: c3 ret
00000000 <_ttypes___elabs>:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
3: 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%esp
6: e8 00 00 00 00 call b <_ttypes___elabs+0xb>
7: DISP32 _get_target_char_size
b: a3 00 00 00 00 mov %eax,0x0
c: dir32 .bss
10: a1 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0,%eax
11: dir32 .bss
15: 89 04 24 mov %eax,(%esp)
18: e8 00 00 00 00 call 1d <_ttypes___elabs+0x1d>
stage2
00000018 <_get_target_char_size>:
18: 55 push %ebp
19: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
1b: b8 08 00 00 00 mov $0x8,%eax
20: c9 leave
21: c3 ret
22: 66 90 xchg %ax,%ax
00000000 <_ttypes___elabs>:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
3: 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%esp
6: e8 00 00 00 00 call b <_ttypes___elabs+0xb>
7: DISP32 _get_target_char_size
b: a3 00 00 00 00 mov %eax,0x0
c: dir32 .bss
10: 89 04 24 mov %eax,(%esp)
13: e8 00 00 00 00 call 18 <_ttypes___elabs+0x18>
--
aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-05-13 13:50:21
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36207