This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/36090] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ppc64 cacoshl miscompilation
- From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 May 2008 21:08:05 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/36090] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ppc64 cacoshl miscompilation
- References: <bug-36090-87@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #19 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-05-02 21:08 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] ppc64 cacoshl miscompilation
> Yes, the patch works, modulo typos.
It was not tested indeed.
> Does it make sense to group any two RTX_CONST_OBJ together of not the same
> type?
I don't know, but replacing the second test with CONSTANT_P should also
be safe.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36090