This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug classpath/21869] We should to use StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer where appropriate.
- From: "gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Feb 2008 15:57:59 -0000
- Subject: [Bug classpath/21869] We should to use StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer where appropriate.
- References: <bug-21869-7151@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 15:57 -------
Waiting on my patch to abstract StringBuffer/Builder being committed.
Then this is simply a matter of adding a class which uses the 'dont_copy'
version of the String constructor with toString.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869