This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/34994] gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_5.f90 doesn't work
- From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jan 2008 00:17:29 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/34994] gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_5.f90 doesn't work
- References: <bug-34994-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-01-28 00:17 -------
With -m32, we got
doit ()
{
real(kind=4) doit1[2];
{
struct array1_real(kind=4) parm.6;
parm.6.dtype = 281;
parm.6.dim[0].lbound = 1;
parm.6.dim[0].ubound = 2;
parm.6.dim[0].stride = 1;
parm.6.data = (void *) &doit1[0];
parm.6.offset = -1;
tm_doit (&parm.6, 0B, 0);
}
goto __return_doit;
__return_doit:;
}
instead of
doit ()
{
real(kind=4) doit1[2];
{
struct array1_real(kind=4) parm.7;
parm.7.dtype = 281;
parm.7.dim[0].lbound = 1;
parm.7.dim[0].ubound = 2;
parm.7.dim[0].stride = 1;
parm.7.data = (void *) &doit1[0];
parm.7.offset = -1;
tm_doit (&parm.7, 0B, 0);
}
goto __return_doit;
__return_doit:;
}
with -m64. But we only expect " tm_doit \\(&parm.7, 0B, 0\\);".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34994