This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/34784] [4.2/4.3 Regression] implicit character(s) hides type of selected_int_kind intrinsic
- From: "dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Jan 2008 18:31:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/34784] [4.2/4.3 Regression] implicit character(s) hides type of selected_int_kind intrinsic
- References: <bug-34784-15620@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-01-23 18:31 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] implicit character(s) hides type of
selected_int_kind intrinsic
I have another example of what might be the same problem, although the
symptoms are
a little different. the error message is
C:gfortran v_ice.f
v_ice.f:21.72:
END MODULE TESTS
1
Internal Error at (1):
gfc_convert_constant(): Unexpected type
If I use either
IMPLICIT CHARACTER (D)
IMPLICIT CHARACTER (E)
things compile, although I'd have expected a problem with either
DIGITS or EPSILON.
A procedure question. Is this the One True Way to add additional
comments or tests
about a bug report? Or is there a better way?
Dick Hendrickson
MODULE TESTS
IMPLICIT CHARACTER (M)
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE VF0010(IDA1,IDA2,RDA,QDA)
INTEGER(4) IDA1(5)
INTEGER(4) IDA2(5)
REAL(4) RLA(5)
REAL(4) RDA(5)
REAL(8) QDA(5)
REAL(8) DCA(5)
! I N I T I A L I Z A T I O N S E C T I O N
INTEGER(KIND=4) :: TEST_ARRAY
$(SUM((/DIGITS(1),DIGITS(RLA(2)),DIGITS(DCA),DIGITS(QDA)/))/10,
$ MIN(6_4,
$ INT((EPSILON(RLA)+EPSILON(ABS(QDA))+EPSILON(DCA))*1.E6)),
$ INT(MIN(RDA(1),HUGE(RLA)/10)+MIN(QDA(1),HUGE(QDA)/10)
$ +MIN(1,HUGE(IDA2))),
$ MIN(6,MAXEXPONENT(1.0_8)+MAXEXPONENT(RLA)+
$ MAXEXPONENT(QDA)))
END SUBROUTINE
END MODULE TESTS
On 20 Jan 2008 16:59:09 -0000, pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 16:59 -------
> Subject: Bug 34784
>
> Author: pault
> Date: Sun Jan 20 16:58:15 2008
> New Revision: 131679
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131679
> Log:
> 2008-01-20 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR fortran/34861
> * resolve.c (resolve_entries): Do not do an array bounds check
> if the result symbols are the same.
>
> PR fortran/34854
> * module.c (read_module) : Hide the symtree of the previous
> version of the symbol if this symbol is renamed.
>
> 2008-01-20 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR fortran/34784
> * gfortran.dg/mapping_2.f90: Correct ubound expression for h4.
>
> PR fortran/34861
> * gfortran.dg/entry_array_specs_3.f90: New test.
>
> PR fortran/34854
> * gfortran.dg/use_rename_1.f90: New test.
>
> Added:
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/entry_array_specs_3.f90
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_rename_1.f90
> Modified:
> trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
> trunk/gcc/fortran/module.c
> trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/mapping_2.f90
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34784
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34784