This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/31780] [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types for ?: with "complex type" conversion
- From: "gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Jan 2008 06:54:06 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/31780] [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types for ?: with "complex type" conversion
- References: <bug-31780-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #27 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2008-01-07 06:54 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types for ?: with
"complex type" conversion
"mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| ------- Comment #26 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-07 01:16
-------
| Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types
| for ?: with "complex type" conversion
|
| gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu wrote:
|
| > I would not bet money that nobody is not using it. However, that
| > somebody is using something specifically non-standard and NOT
| > documented GNU extension.
| >
| > This situatiation is radically very different from the one where the
| > constructor would have been documented as GNU extension
|
| It isn't different to the user.
Surely it is. If it a documented GNU extension, then it is a promise we
must keep. If it a standard constructor, then we don't have the choice.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31780