This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/33887] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Reference to bitfield gets wrong value when optimizing
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Dec 2007 14:36:45 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/33887] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Reference to bitfield gets wrong value when optimizing
- References: <bug-33887-1313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de 2007-12-14 14:36 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Reference to bitfield
gets wrong value when optimizing
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, bonzini at gnu dot org wrote:
> I have a patch that makes the reduce_bitfield_operations langhook a per-type
> field, but it doesn't affect code generation.
>
> Isn't there a testcase in the C++ library that fails if the langhook is
> false?...
Unfortunately not :( But there are lots of libjava testsuite failures.
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33887