This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/34230] Expressions of parameters evaluated with too high precision



------- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-28 19:35 -------
> > If +Inf is a representable value, you need to go fix the IO subsystem
> > to read +Inf (and NaN).

I just checked:

- NAG f95, g95, ifort and sunf95 accept (case insensitive and with optional
"+"/"-" prefix) "NAN" and "INF", "Infinity". ("infini" is for instance
rejected.) 

- openf95, gfortran and g77 reject it.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34230


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]