This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/32122] indirect goto to an integer accepted



------- Comment #2 from sjackman at gmail dot com  2007-11-23 17:30 -------
I've always used `goto *123;' on embedded targets as a feature to be able to
jump to a constant address. This particularly useful feature should not be
removed. Is a simple change of syntax being suggested, such as `goto *(void
*)123;'? Dereferencing a void pointer looks strange to me, but I guess no
stranger than dereferencing an integer.


-- 

sjackman at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sjackman at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]