This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/34067] [4.3 regression] gfortran.dg/char_cshift_2.f90 fails with -O3 -funroll-loops fails on Intel Darwin
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Nov 2007 08:10:24 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/34067] [4.3 regression] gfortran.dg/char_cshift_2.f90 fails with -O3 -funroll-loops fails on Intel Darwin
- References: <bug-34067-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-11-13 08:10 -------
> and the from the debugger which field of the array caused the abort and maybe even good
> and bad char_cshift_2.*.fwprop* dumps? Can you hit breakpoint on _gfortran_cshift1_4_char
> and _gfortran_cshift1_8_char and compare the incoming and outgoing arrays between a good
> and bad version?
This will take a little more time (I have to restore the revision and rebuild
gcc). I have printed the
arrays a and b, and with shift4 the first 4 lines, i.e., b(:,1:2,1) is
different from the corresponding a's.
Do you know the important differences in the config files for Darwin8 and
Linux?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34067