This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free
- From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Nov 2007 16:10:18 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free
- References: <bug-34003-11564@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 16:10 -------
Interesting. Something platform-specific must be going wrong here.
The original build failure shouldn't have happened even without
the attached patch because ggc-none.o should provide a definition
of ggc_free. The cc1 link shouldn't fail because $(GGC).o should
be linked into libbackend.a.
It's probably easier to track down why the original failure happened,
rather than why the cc1 one happened, so could you try again without
the patch I attached and see why ggc-none.o isn't providing a
definition of ggc_free?
As things stand, I don't think this was caused by my 2006 patch
after all, so I'll unassign myself to avoid confusion. (I'll keep
myself on cc: because I'm curious what's wrong.)
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2007-11-06 21:38:47 |2007-11-08 16:10:18
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003