This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/33936] need to re-open bug 20815
- From: "znmeb at cesmail dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Oct 2007 04:37:56 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/33936] need to re-open bug 20815
- References: <bug-33936-13471@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from znmeb at cesmail dot net 2007-10-29 04:37 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> well you need to provide more information really, like a testcase.
>
I uploaded the file that the second compile croaked on. It will take me a while
to come up with a simpler test case ... this is the whole Ruby language
interpreter I'm working with. :)
Does it matter that the build occurred in a copy of the source tree and that
the "gcno" and "gcda" files were copied back into the source directory? Does it
care about paths, etc.?
--
znmeb at cesmail dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |znmeb at cesmail dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33936