This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/33897] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Entries and modules
- From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Oct 2007 13:38:05 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/33897] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Entries and modules
- References: <bug-33897-14284@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-26 13:38 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > As a final remark: Digital F90 5.0 gives the result of gfortran in #4, so now I
> > am convinced that I am right!
> I was actually not so sure as you seem to be. I agree it is intuitive to
> consider it available through host association. I'm only surprised that NAG,
> IBM, g95, Lahey, pgf90 consistently say it is not (i.e. they all print 42 42
> 99).
How about I take it to comp.lang.fortran?
I find nothing in the standard that says that entries should not be host
associated and plenty to say that they should. Why would entrys be availeble
by use association and not by host association within the module?
Anyway, thanks for giving it your attention.
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33897