This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/33619] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] TER breaks some inline-asm code (again)



------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com  2007-10-05 17:05 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] TER breaks some inline-asm code (again)

On 5 Oct 2007 10:58:10 -0000, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-05 10:58 -------
> If __builtin_expect is the only problem, then we could certainly allow
> __builtin_expect to be replaceable (perhaps add a few other builtin calls
> that never result in any actual calls, like __builtin_object_size).

well those should be foldded before exand now so i am not worried about them.

--Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33619


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]