This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
- From: "ddaney at avtrex dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Sep 2007 21:36:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
- References: <bug-33256-15046@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #17 from ddaney at avtrex dot com 2007-09-05 21:36 -------
Subject: Re: internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc,
at config/mips/mips.c:5579
richard at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> ------- Comment #16 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-05 21:22 -------
> Subject: Re: internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at
> config/mips/mips.c:5579
>
> "ddaney at avtrex dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>> My concern was that the bug only occurs for me with -EB, so running the
>> test case with -EL would be pointless. I understand that you do most of
>> your testing on the simulator, but for someone doing testing on little
>> endian hardware there is no coverage without the -EB.
>
> OK. As I said before, I didn't think it would be pointless, because
> we do want to make sure this continues to work for -EL too.
The only time loading the low order bits of a word is done at an offset
from the base of the word is in big endian. So I don't think it will
ever fail on a little endian system, but I may be missing something.
> (There's
> generally very little coverage of -mabi=64 -msym32; the only user I know
> of is linux.) However, I'll yield and make mips.exp skip the test when
> running explicitly-EL multilibs.
Thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256