This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
- From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Aug 2007 10:10:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
- References: <bug-33174-10129@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-27 10:10 -------
So everything (target == host) is cygwin. I'm sorry for the confusion, but as
you talked about MSYS in your original report, I thought it would be some kind
of cygwin-hosted mingw compiler...
About the failures themselves:
* it is currently expected that
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_integer.f90 fails, because of a bug
in the cygwin math library; I'm surprised that it doesn't fail for you
* could you try to compile pr32417.f90 yourself, and produce a backtrace of
the ICE? Use "gfortran -v pr32417.f90", from the output of that command, look
at the command-line for the "f951" command, run it under gdb (gdb -args
/path/to/f951 .....), set a breakpoint on fancy_abort ("break fancy_abort") and
when the breakpoint (or a segfault) is hit, ask for backtrace ("backtrace").
Copy-paste the result here.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC target triplet| |i686-pc-cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174