This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Bogus gimplification type mismatch error ?

From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:49:06 +0100
Subject: Re: RFC: Bogus gimplification type mismatch error ?
References: <m3y7g6v7kx.fsf@redhat.com> <de8d50360708200317s5cc5562l2d10293ed5c20253@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Andrew,

As mentioned before this error message is really an internal error, we
really should be fixing GCC and not changing binutils. And I already
mentioned this is most likely PR 22371 and that you should be filing
bug reports about these two errors/ICEs.

I have filed PR 33122 to cover this problem and added a comment to PR 22371 mentioning that 33122 might be a duplicate.

Cheers
  Nick

References:
- RFC: Bogus gimplification type mismatch error ?
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: RFC: Bogus gimplification type mismatch error ?
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]