This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/32658] Supposedly illegal conversion compiles without errors
- From: "aribrei at arcor dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Aug 2007 16:34:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/32658] Supposedly illegal conversion compiles without errors
- References: <bug-32658-11053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from aribrei at arcor dot de 2007-08-02 16:34 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > I should note that I do NOT want to see this bug fixed. I would prefer to hear
> > that you won't "fix" it at all. So I can exploit this behavior as there is no
> > standards-compliant way of achieving the same results.
>
> Is it possible that rvalue references will give you an alternative for the
> desired effect? See the relevant papers linked to from here:
>
> http://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2291.html
>
This would mean that instead of A::A(A &), I wrote A::A(A &&) and passing
temporaries would automatically work?
(Not sure if I correctly understand the r-value reference proposal.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32658