This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
- From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jul 2007 07:27:30 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
- References: <bug-32727-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 07:27 -------
> BTW, if you revert a patch, you should add the testcase that is the reason
> it. To avoid regressing again if the patch gets re-applied. Similarly, you
> should xfail the other testcase that now fails.
Joost,
good point. I thought about XFAIL, but then again, probably nobody will notice
that there's something wrong since it's expected to fail. Hence I concluded
that it would be preferable to have people asking about a testsuite failure
twice a day then to hide the problem it in an xfail :)
However, if Paul does find the time today, I'm positive that he will set it
right -- otherwise I will implement your suggestion tomorrow.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727