This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/32462] [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
- From: "ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Jul 2007 17:57:04 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/32462] [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
- References: <bug-32462-81@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-07-03 17:57 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
I compared the assembler files corresponding to java/.libs/process-Posix.o
and built with both gcj 4.2.1 20070611 and 4.3.0 20070618 and compared the
results: the primary differences are like this:
@@ -1886,9 +2012,8 @@
movl %eax, %esi
movl %eax, (%esp)
call _ZN4java4lang6ObjectC1Ev@PLT
- movl _ZN4java4lang12PosixProcess9queueLockE@GOT(%ebx), %eax
- movl %esi, (%eax)
-.LBE57:
+ movl %esi, _ZN4java4lang12PosixProcess9queueLockE@GOTOFF(%ebx)
+.LBE60:
movl 4(%esp), %ebx
movl 8(%esp), %esi
addl $12, %esp
I've uploaded both files for further inspection.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32462