This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/32230] [4.3 Regression] Segfault in set_bb_for_stmt with -O -ftree-vectorize
- From: "irar at il dot ibm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jun 2007 12:29:25 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/32230] [4.3 Regression] Segfault in set_bb_for_stmt with -O -ftree-vectorize
- References: <bug-32230-12387@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2007-06-28 12:29 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> I suppose rejecting NULL bases should work here?
Yes, only it's not NULL it's zero (0B).
We can reject it in the vectorizer or not create a dr for it...
Ira
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32230