This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/32327] [4.2 Regression] Incorrect stack sharing causing removal of live code
- From: "dougkwan at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Jun 2007 00:14:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/32327] [4.2 Regression] Incorrect stack sharing causing removal of live code
- References: <bug-32327-91@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from dougkwan at google dot com 2007-06-14 00:14 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Incorrect stack sharing causing removal of live
code
I thought like you do initially. But then I was told that in gimple
everything is promoted to function scope. So dest is not out of scope.
-Doug
13 Jun 2007 21:53:15 -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 21:53 -------
> Is that really true? The underlying issue is sinking the store is causing the
> variables to in the same "scope". I think that is the real underlying issue
> and nothing to do with local stack sharing.
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32327
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32327