This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libfortran/31052] [4.2 only] Bad IOSTAT values when readings NAMELISTs past EOF



------- Comment #46 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net  2007-04-13 08:05 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 only] Bad IOSTAT values when readings
 NAMELISTs past EOF

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #45 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-13 05:32 -------
> (In reply to comment #44)
>> sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K started to fail on Mar. 19:
> And then start passing and then again started to fail again on/around April
> 1st.  HJL when will you please get your dates correct.
> 
> 
Now I am confused because I reverted and re-patched and it was tested by spark 
and sixtrack was then fine.  I specifically had this tested before committing 
the last fix.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]