This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/31550] [regression] f951: segfault in fold-const.c:1963



------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-12 19:37 -------
What is really odd is that the same code (see below) is produced, with or
without the ONLY... It looks fine in either case and identical to that produced
by 4.2. *sigh*

Is this a problem with the backend?

Paul

dummy_atom_list_init_copy (this, other)
{
  int8 D.1373;
  int8 D.1372;
  struct dummy_atom[0:] * D.1371;
  int8 D.1370;
  int8 D.1369;
  struct dummy_atom[0:] * D.1368;

  D.1368 = (struct dummy_atom[0:] *) other->table.data;
  D.1369 = other->table.offset;
  D.1370 = (int8) other->nused;
  D.1371 = (struct dummy_atom[0:] *) this->table.data;
  D.1372 = this->table.offset;
  D.1373 = (int8) this->nused;
  {
    int8 D.1376;
    int8 D.1375;
    int8 S.0;

    D.1375 = other->table.dim[0].stride;
    D.1376 = this->table.dim[0].stride;
    S.0 = 1;
    while (1)
      {
        if (S.0 > (int8) other->nused) goto L.1;
        (*D.1371)[S.0 * D.1376 + D.1372] = (*D.1368)[S.0 * D.1375 + D.1369];
        S.0 = S.0 + 1;
      }
    L.1:;
  }
}


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31550


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]