This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/31136] [4.2 Regression] FRE ignores bit-field truncation (C and C++ front-end don't produce bit-field truncation



------- Comment #7 from spark at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-23 05:00 -------
Follow up on Joseph's analysis:

The problematic STRIP_SIGN_NOPS() call is from fold_unary()
which is called from try_combine_conversion() in tree-ssa-pre.c.

STRIP_SIGN_NOPS() is called with the expression:

 <nop_expr 0x866f220
    type <integer_type 0xf7e30678 public unsigned QI
        size <integer_cst 0xf7d781e0 constant invariant 8>
        unit size <integer_cst 0xf7d781f8 constant invariant 1>
        align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 precision 4 min <integer_cst 0xf7e32618
0> max <integer_cst 0xf7e32630 15>>

    arg 0 <integer_cst 0xf7e327b0 type <integer_type 0xf7e306d4> constant
invariant 31>>

and it stripes away the conversion,
leaving only integer constant 31.
This is clearly wrong as it removes the downconversion of precision.

Following patch (against 4.2 branch) seems to fix the problem:

Index: tree.h
===================================================================
--- tree.h      (revision 123088)
+++ tree.h      (working copy)
@@ -912,7 +912,9 @@ extern void omp_clause_range_check_faile
         && (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (EXP))                        \
             == TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (EXP, 0))))  \
         && (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (EXP))                    \
-            == TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (EXP, 0))))) \
+            == TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (EXP, 0))))\
+        && (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (EXP))                   \
+            >= TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (EXP, 0)))))\
     (EXP) = TREE_OPERAND (EXP, 0)

 /* Like STRIP_NOPS, but don't alter the TREE_TYPE either.  */


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31136


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]