This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/26797] [4.3 regression] ACATS cxh1001 fails
- From: "kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Mar 2007 14:29:24 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/26797] [4.3 regression] ACATS cxh1001 fails
- References: <bug-26797-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #36 from kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-03-09 14:29 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] ACATS cxh1001 fails
> I don't think this is a very serious problem. My understanding is
> that the checks can be divided into two classes: normal checks and
> validity checks. A normal check, such as when you do a type
> conversion, does not use a V_C_E, it just does:
>
> if (y < new_type_lb || y > new_type_ub)
> abort;
> new_var = (new_type) y;
Not clear. Consider the range check for a subscript on the LHS, for
example. These issues are *very* subtle ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26797