This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/11856] unsigned warning in template



------- Comment #20 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-17 12:32 -------
> The particularity of such expressions is that they are constants.

I've thought about this a bit but I don't have a real conclusion.

I don't know why this warning was added in the first place... it seems
like perhaps it was to deal with comparisons against constants.
For instance comparing "unsigned < 0" or what have you.  If this is the
case (and we'd have to dig a bit to find out) then that would seem to
argue against this approach.

My interest here is template-oriented... I consider it from a generic
programming point of view.  I was trying to write a certain program
in the generic style, and one particular template instantiation yielded
a warning.

One possible idea would be an expression attriute of some kind:

__do_not_warn__ (val < 0)

I'm not extremely happy with this however.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11856


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]