This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/29818] code with SSE segfaults with gcc-3.4.6, runs fine with gcc-4.1.1



------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-11-14 01:17 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I am developing pretty heavy SSE-based code, and performance-wise gcc-3.4.6 is
> the best so far. Sorry, I cant' post the code, but here are performance
> figures (output of 'time' command):

Then, you are not helping the project: a closed branch is not re-opened because
of a bug and posting performance numbers without a *reduced* snippet
pinpointing the specific issue is not useful to the developers (the only
possible effect is making someone slightly nervous ;)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29818


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]