This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/29797] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Miscompiles bit test / set in OpenOffice
- From: "roger at eyesopen dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Nov 2006 19:41:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/29797] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Miscompiles bit test / set in OpenOffice
- References: <bug-29797-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #13 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-11-10 19:41 -------
Grr. Yep, Michael's BITS_BIG_ENDIAN test looks to be the correct thing. The
effect of BITS_BIG_ENDIAN on sign_extract and zero_extract is documented in
rtl.texi. Is anyone bootstrapping and regression testing this change or shall
I do the honors. In fact, I'll pre-approve it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797