This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/29335] transcendental functions with constant arguments should be resolved at compile-time
- From: "vincent at vinc17 dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Nov 2006 23:27:41 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/29335] transcendental functions with constant arguments should be resolved at compile-time
- References: <bug-29335-578@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #33 from vincent at vinc17 dot org 2006-11-05 23:27 -------
(In reply to comment #32)
> (In reply to comment #31)
> > (In reply to comment #30)
> > So, I don't think a mpfr_signgam alone would really be useful. So, I think that
> > choice 2 would be better.
>
> Okay, sounds fine. Would this make it into 2.2.1 or 2.3?
For compatibility reasons (i.e. the 2.2.x versions must have the same
interface), this can only be in 2.3.0.
> And do you have any very rough timeframe for each release so I can plan
> accordingly for gcc?
A pre-release of 2.2.1 should be there soon; there are still bugs being fixed
(they will be ported to the 2.2 branch once this is complete).
I don't know about 2.3.0; probably in a few months, because there currently
aren't many differences from the 2.2 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335