This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/27698] subroutine _foo draws "unclassifiable statement" instead of a useful error.
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Nov 2006 17:00:35 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/27698] subroutine _foo draws "unclassifiable statement" instead of a useful error.
- References: <bug-27698-109@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #9 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-11-05 17:00 -------
Subject: Re: subroutine _foo draws "unclassifiable statement" instead of a
useful error.
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:37:42PM -0000, aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> > How does Intel's iand other commercial compilers handle
> > a leading dollar? The standard is quite clear that the
> > first character in a name is an alphabetic character.
> >
> ifort-9.1.xx accept it without any notice.
> Why would a leading dollar be different to anywhere else in a name?
>
IIRC, the use of $ is a Digital extension on VMS. It's
been more than 15 years since I used VMS, but I vaguely
remmeber seeing Fortran with the $ only in the 2nd position.
But, if Intel (a Digital descented) accepts the leading
dollar sign, then your suggested modification is probably
correct.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27698