This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/29281] natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:148: internal compiler error
- From: "sangsu at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Sep 2006 03:05:58 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/29281] natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:148: internal compiler error
- References: <bug-29281-13325@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from sangsu at gmail dot com 2006-09-29 03:05 -------
and i used a gcc configuration below...
========================= start =========================
../gcc-3.4.5/configure --target=arm-linux --prefix=/usr/local/arm/
--with-headers=/ojt/kernel/linux-2.6.17/include/
========================= end =========================
(In reply to comment #1)
> before configuring glibc...
> i had some patches, too
> ======================== start =======================
> --- gcc-3.4.1/gcc/flow.c.old 2004-02-27 19:39:19.000000000 -0800
> +++ gcc-3.4.1/gcc/flow.c 2004-08-26 07:29:46.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1878,6 +1878,7 @@
> rtx set_src = SET_SRC (pc_set (BB_END (bb)));
> rtx cond_true = XEXP (set_src, 0);
> rtx reg = XEXP (cond_true, 0);
> + enum rtx_code inv_cond;
> if (GET_CODE (reg) == SUBREG)
> reg = SUBREG_REG (reg);
> @@ -1886,11 +1887,13 @@
> in the form of a comparison of a register against zero.
> If the condition is more complex than that, then it is safe
> not to record any information. */
> - if (GET_CODE (reg) == REG
> + inv_cond = reversed_comparison_code (cond_true, BB_END (bb));
> + if (inv_cond != UNKNOWN
> + && GET_CODE (reg) == REG
> && XEXP (cond_true, 1) == const0_rtx)
> {
> rtx cond_false
> - = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (reverse_condition (GET_CODE (cond_true)),
> + = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (inv_cond,
> GET_MODE (cond_true), XEXP (cond_true, 0),
> XEXP (cond_true, 1));
>  if (GET_CODE (XEXP (set_src, 1)) == PC)
> ===================== end ============================
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > i'm a korean embedded linux engineer.
> > i'm making a cross tool-chain.
> > (gcc-3.4.1 / glibc-2.3.2 / binutils-2.15 / linux-2.6.17)
> > i used some configuration like below.
> > ../binutils-2.15/configure --target=arm-linux --prefix=/usr/local/arm
> > --disable-nls
> > ../gcc-3.4.5/configure --target=arm-linux --prefix=/usr/local/arm/
> > --with-cpu=arm9 --disable-threads --disable-shared --enable-languages=c
> > i had some patches...
> > ?å vi sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ioperm.c
> > ?å change "BUS_ISA" to be "CTL_BUS_ISA" lines 103 and 104
> > ?å vi Makeconfig
> > ?å change all occurrances of "O2" to "O"
> > ?å remove any occurrances of -lgcc_eh
> > ?å vi configure
> > ?å change all occurrances of "O2" to "O"
> > ?å touch sysdeps/arm/framestate.c
> > ?å Rm ¡Vrf nptl
> > ?å vi sysdeps/generic/wordexp.c
> > ?å /* Function called by child process in exec_comm() */
> > ?å -static void
> > ?å +static inline void
> > ?å internal_function __attribute__ ((always_inline))
> > ../glibc-2.3.6/configure --target=arm-linux --host=arm-linux
> > --prefix=/usr/local/arm/arm-linux/ --enable-add-ons=linuxthreads
> > --with-headers=/usr/src/linux/include/
> > but, i got some errors like below
> > =================================== error start
> > =====================================
> > gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc: In member function `virtual void
> > gnu::java::net::PlainDatagramSocketImpl::bind(jint, java::net::InetAddress*)':
> > gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:148: internal compiler error: in
> > arm_print_operand, at config/arm/arm.c:9810
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> > ========================================= error end
> > =====================================
> > i've known that you got similar error and you fixed it through
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/.
> > so, i wonder how you fixed that bug??
> > help me plz...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29281