This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/29134] Has there been a serious attempt to define the max_size() member functions?
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Sep 2006 10:22:39 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/29134] Has there been a serious attempt to define the max_size() member functions?
- References: <bug-29134-13273@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #16 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-09-21 10:22 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Ok, seems sane enough. Just curious about the omission.
I'm going to adjust vstring first. Hopefully we can back port something to
basic_string, but really seems tricky (_S_max_size is static, exported,
blah...)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29134