This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug java/28938] [ecj] update build instructions to account for changes



------- Comment #3 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch  2006-09-21 08:21 -------
Subject: Re:  [ecj] update build instructions to account for
 changes


> This is found using the normal gcc specs approach.  In a distribution
> I'd expect ecj1 to end up in the gcc-lib dir.  In my case I just have
> it on my PATH.
>
> We won't be including the ecj sources in the gcc tree.  As I recall that
> was rejected by the SC.  So it will always be a separate download.
>   
The best thing would be if I could just "sudo apt-get install ecj".  If 
there are any differences between ecj and ecj1, we should provide some 
kind of wrapper.  A nice possibility, would be to support dropping the 
downloaded JAR somewhere in the tree where it installs correctly and 
automagically.  This would not be against the SC decision.
> Both ecj and the new gcjh can be run on any vm, including all the free
> ones.  I've built libgcj many times running these purely interpreted
> and it is not painfully slow.
Cool, though not unexpected because the code generation of Java 
bytecodes is not that hard (apart from the unreachable and uninitialized 
code checking).

Paolo


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28938


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]