This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/28886] [4.1/4.2 regression] Template specialization with array rejected



------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-02 01:36 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> So, that's what should be fixed.
Except that means introducing a language hook which is only to be useful in one
place.
The other way of fixing this is not to call fold if we have a MINUS_EXPR with
the 2nd operand as 1, we just use the first.  Really I don't see any reason why
we should introduce a language hook when we can just strip the NON_LVALUE_EXPR
right after fold and introducing a language hook which will only help in one
specific case.
The real real way of fixing this is to move the C++ front-end's templates from
using trees and use something which is just specific to the C++ front-end and
we would not have to call fold here at all since we will just store the length
of the array instead of the "length-1".


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28886


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]