This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/28908] [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for Fortran operator
- From: "paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 Aug 2006 17:41:07 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/28908] [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for Fortran operator
- References: <bug-28908-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #13 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-31 17:41 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails
for Fortran operator
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>------- Comment #12 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-31 16:57 -------
>It also fails with gcc 4.1 revision 116602.
>
>
>
>
Yes, I know.
I have a patch that seems to work but I do not like it very much; still,
it is a sign of progress! I am rushing on this one, HJ, but I want to
get it right.
The problem is that operator interfaces is a part of gfortran that I
have rarely touched and I do not know my way around. They have
namespaces that do not have very much of anything attached to them, as
far as I can see. That's why the simple fix causes a segfault.
However, I cannot quite see how the symbols for the arguments are
attached to the namespace.
I'll be with you as soon as I have a solution - < 24hours now.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28908