This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/28866] [Regression] Simple if statements are not so simple
- From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Aug 2006 19:47:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/28866] [Regression] Simple if statements are not so simple
- References: <bug-28866-10110@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 19:47 -------
Subject: Bug 28866
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Aug 29 19:47:31 2006
New Revision: 116570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116570
Log:
2006-08-29 Steven G. Kargl <kargls@comcast.net>
PR fortran/28866
* match.c: Wrap copyright.
(gfc_match_assignment): Return MATCH_NO for failed lvalue. Remove
gotos. Move error handling of FL_PARAMETER to ...
* gfc_match_if: Deal with MATCH_NO from above.
* primary.c: Wrap copyright.
(match_variable): ... here. Improve error messages.
2006-08-29 Steven G. Kargl <kargls@comcast.net>
PR fortran/28866
* gfortran.dg/simpleif_2.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pr19936_1.f90: Adjust dg-error message.
* gfortran.dg/enum_5.f90: Ditto.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/enum_5.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr19936_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/simpleif_2.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28866