This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared
- From: wieseltux23 <wieseltux23 at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 19:58:27 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared
- References: <bug-28102-12387@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> <20060715161434.24586.qmail@sourceware.org>
http://en.fon.com/
On 15 Jul 2006 16:14:34 -0000
"pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #10 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-07-15 16:14 -------
> Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
>
> Oh did I forget (again) to say you really should be posting
> patches to the gcc-patches mailing list. If you want them
> be included. And I still say the patch is incorrect. I already
> explained why I thought it was incorrect as linux.h should not
> be included. Also the comment in your patch is incorrect
> as the definition comes from config/linux.h and not from
> config/i386/linux.h.
>
> -- Pinski
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
>