This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86
- From: "ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Jun 2006 18:15:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86
- References: <bug-27937-81@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-21 18:15 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> > Ok, thanks for the explanation. But right now, the FSF tree has M_F_F_S_F
> > definitions for neither Solaris/SPARC nor /x86, AFAIKT. And Solaris/SPARC
> > and Solaris/SPARCv9 can turn on ZCX and are thus unaffected, while
> > Solaris/x86 has ZCX off, which breaks bootstrap.
>
> ZCX are already turned on for SPARC/Solaris.
That's what I meant. I wondered why it's turned on without M_F_F_S_F and
works while it's off on Solaris/x86.
> > Since this is a mainline regression from 3.x/4.[01], do you think there
> > could be a fix/workaround in place for 4.2.0?
>
> Sure, someone has to write it. :-)
Which is true for most fixes :-)
Thanks.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27937