This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/27793] [4.1 Regression] num_ssa_names inconsistent or immediate use iterator wrong
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Jun 2006 16:37:50 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/27793] [4.1 Regression] num_ssa_names inconsistent or immediate use iterator wrong
- References: <bug-27793-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #14 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-06-06 16:37 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] num_ssa_names inconsistent
or immediate use iterator wrong
amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> ------- Comment #13 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-06-06 14:43 -------
> Created an attachment (id=11609)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11609&action=view)
> --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11609&action=view)
> assert to add if Jakub's idea is implemented.
>
> So do you want to fix it Jakub's way instead of hacking up the tree optimizer?
> or would you still prefer to simply apply my patch for now in 4.1 and 4.2?
Please go ahead and apply your patch. (It's ready now, and Jakub's idea
isn't.)
> If/when Jakub's suggestion is implemented, I suggest adding the following
> assert so you will know you have actually fixed it. This assert will trigger
> whenever there is a duplicate DECL_UID on a variable. It triggers on
> testcases from both this PR and 26757.
Thanks!!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27793