This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/25569] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/20010610.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
- From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Mar 2006 19:37:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/25569] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/20010610.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
- References: <bug-25569-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-10 19:37 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/g77/20010610.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 00:07 +0000, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> ------- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 00:07 -------
> A regression hunt on powerpc64-linux using the C test case from comment #4
> identified this patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=110705
>
> r110705 | law | 2006-02-07 18:31:27 +0000 (Tue, 07 Feb 2006)
>
>
> That date doesn't match up with when the Fortran test started failing so I ran
> another regression hunt using it, which identified this patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=108425
>
> r108425 | law | 2005-12-12 19:59:16 +0000 (Mon, 12 Dec 2005)
Just an FYI -- I probably won't be able to start looking at this
until Monday. Hopefully it'll be something I can hunt down
with a cross compiler as I don't have a ppc64 box :-)
jeff
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25569