This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libgcj/26483] Wrong parsing of doubles when interpreted
- From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Feb 2006 21:50:19 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libgcj/26483] Wrong parsing of doubles when interpreted
- References: <bug-26483-3744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-02-28 21:50 -------
Subject: Re: Wrong parsing of doubles when interpreted
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #6 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-02-28 21:40 -------
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > > The number 5e-324 exceeds the range of the (C language) double type. So the
> >
> > It's (just) within the range of denormal values for IEEE double precision.
>
> 5e-324 is already out of range. The limit is about 4.941e–324.
4.941e-324 < 5e-324.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483