This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/26264] Extraneous warning with __builtin_stdarg_start and optimization



------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-13 19:08 -------
Subject: Re:  Extraneous warning with __builtin_stdarg_start and optimization

> ------- Comment #5 from James dot Juran at baesystems dot com  2006-02-13 19:06 -------
> Yes, that does seem to be the case based on the ChangeLog I quoted.  And of
> course the easy workaround for a developer is just to use __builtin_va_start
> instead.  But is the deprecation of __builtin_stdarg_start documented anywhere?
>  As I noted in the PR, I looked and couldn't find any mention of its
> deprecation.

Why is the developer using an undocumented builtin in the first place?

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26264


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]