This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/25950] [3.4/4.0/4.1] [DR 392] Reference binding and explicit copy constructors
- From: "hhinnant at apple dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Jan 2006 03:24:44 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/25950] [3.4/4.0/4.1] [DR 392] Reference binding and explicit copy constructors
- References: <bug-25950-11686@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #13 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2006-01-25 03:24 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> | Did you read comment 3?
>
> Yes. Is your claim that whether the copy constructor is converting or
> not does not matter?
No. My suspicion is that there is a 99.99% chance that EDG is conforming to
C++03 in this regard. And furthermore, their behavior (which is different from
ours) is preferable to our customers.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25950