This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/22136] [4.1/4.2 regression] Rejects old-style using declaration
- From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Jan 2006 23:12:55 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/22136] [4.1/4.2 regression] Rejects old-style using declaration
- References: <bug-22136-102@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 23:12 -------
I agree that this should be a P1.
Why do we think I<T>::B is a non-dependent type? It should be considered
dependent, because we may have a specialization of I for which B is not a base
class. There are some cases in the parser where we must resolve dependent
types; I wonder if we're incorrectly doing that in this case.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22136